Paper detail

Intelligent requirements engineering from natural language and their chaining toward CAD models

This paper assumes that design language plays an important role in how designers design and on the creativity of designers. Designers use and develop models as an aid to thinking, a focus for discussion and decision-making and a means of evaluating the reliability of the proposals. This paper proposes an intelligent method for requirements engineering from natural language and their chaining toward CAD models. The transition from linguistic analysis to the representation of engineering requirements consists of the translation of the syntactic structure into semantic form represented by conceptual graphs. Based on the isomorphism between conceptual graphs and predicate logic, a formal language of the specification is proposed. The outcome of this language is chained and translated in Computer Aided Three-Dimensional Interactive Application (CATIA) models. The tool (EGEON: Engineering desiGn sEmantics elabOration and applicatioN) is developed to represent the semantic network of engineering requirements. A case study on the design of a car door hinge is presented to illustrates the proposed method.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.