Paper detail

IntelliAd Understanding In-APP Ad Costs From Users Perspective

Ads are an important revenue source for mobile app development, especially for free apps, whose expense can be compensated by ad revenue. The ad benefits also carry with costs. For example, too many ads can interfere the user experience, leading to less user retention and reduced earnings ultimately. In the paper, we aim at understanding the ad costs from users perspective. We utilize app reviews, which are widely recognized as expressions of user perceptions, to identify the ad costs concerned by users. Four types of ad costs, i.e., number of ads, memory/CPU overhead, traffic usage, and bettery consumption, have been discovered from user reviews. To verify whether different ad integration schemes generate different ad costs, we first obtain the commonly used ad schemes from 104 popular apps, and then design a framework named IntelliAd to automatically measure the ad costs of each scheme. To demonstrate whether these costs indeed influence users reactions, we finally observe the correlations between the measured ad costs and the user perceptions. We discover that the costs related to memory/CPU overhead and battery consumption are more concerned by users, while the traffic usage is less concerned by users in spite of its obvious variations among different schemes in the experiments. Our experimental results provide the developers with suggestions on better incorporating ads into apps and, meanwhile, ensuring the user experience.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.