Paper detail

Integration on the Surreals: a Conjecture of Conway, Kruskal and Norton

In his monograph On Numbers and Games, J. H. Conway introduced a real-closed field No of surreal numbers containing the reals and the ordinals, as well as a vast array of less familiar numbers. A longstanding aim has been to develop analysis on No as a powerful extension of ordinary analysis on the reals. This entails finding a natural way of extending important functions f from the reals to the reals to functions f* from the surreals to the surreals, and naturally defining integration on the f*. The usual square root, log, and exp were naturally extended to No by Bach, Conway, Kruskal, and Norton, retaining their usual properties. Later Norton also proposed a treatment of integration, but Kruskal discovered it has flaws. In his recent survey [2, p. 438], Siegel characterizes the question of the existence of a reasonable definition of surreal integration as "perhaps the most important open problem in the theory of surreal numbers." This paper addresses this and related unresolved issues with positive and negative results. In the positive direction, we show that semi-algebraic, semi-analytic, analytic, meromorphic, or more generally Écalle-Borel transseriable functions extend naturally to No, and an integral with good properties exists on them. In the negative direction, we show there is a fundamental set-theoretic obstruction to naturally extending many larger families of functions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.