Paper detail

Integration of Clinical, Biological, and Computational Perspectives to Support Cerebral Autoregulatory Informed Clinical Decision Making Decomposing Cerebral Autoregulation using Mechanistic Timescales to Support Clinical Decision-Making

Adequate brain perfusion is required for proper brain function and life. Maintaining optimal brain perfusion to avoid secondary brain injury is one of the main concerns of neurocritical care. Cerebral autoregulation is responsible for maintaining optimal brain perfusion despite pressure derangements. Knowledge of cerebral autoregulatory function should be a key factor in clinical decision-making, yet it is often insufficiently and incorrectly applied. Multiple physiologic mechanisms impact cerebral autoregulation, each of which operate on potentially different and incompletely understood timescales confounding conclusions drawn from observations. Because of such complexities, clinical conceptualization of cerebral autoregulation has been distilled into practical indices defined by multimodal neuromonitoring, which removes mechanistic information and limits decision options. The next step towards cerebral autoregulatory-informed clinical decision-making is to quantify cerebral autoregulation mechanistically, which requires decomposing cerebral autoregulation into its fundamental processes and partitioning those processes into the timescales at which each operates. In this review, we scrutinize biologically, clinically, and computationally focused literature to build a timescales-based framework around cerebral autoregulation. This new framework will allow us to quantify mechanistic interactions and directly infer which mechanism(s) are functioning based only on current monitoring equipment, paving the way for a new frontier in cerebral autoregulatory-informed clinical decision-making.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.