Paper detail

Integral Representation of Hydraulic Permeability

In this paper, we show that the permeability of a porous {material} and that of a bubbly fluid are limiting cases of the complexified version of the two-fluid models posed in {Lipton_Avellaneda_1990}. We assume the viscosity of the inclusion fluid is $zμ_1$ and the viscosity of the hosting fluid is $μ_1\in \mathbb{R}^+$, $z\in\mathbb{C}$. The proof is carried out by the construction of solutions for large $|z|$ and small $|z|$ with an iteration process and the analytic continuation. Moreover, we also show that for a fixed microstructure, the permeabilities of these three cases share the same integral representation formula (IRF) in Equation (99) with different values of contrast parameter $s:=1/(z-1)$, as long as $s$ is outside the interval $[-\frac{2E_2^2}{1+2E_2^2},-\frac{1}{1+2E_1^2}]$, where the positive constants $E_1$ and $E_2$ are the extension constants that depend only on the geometry of the periodic pore space of the material.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.