Paper detail

INTEGRAL probes the morphology of the Crab nebula in hard X-rays/soft gamma-rays

Aims. We use the IBIS/ISGRI telescope on-board INTEGRAL to measure the position of the centroid of the 20-200 keV emission from the Crab region. Methods. We find that the astrometry of the IBIS telescope is affected by the temperature of the IBIS mask during the observation. After correcting for this effect, we show that the systematic errors in the astrometry of the telescope are of the order of 0.5 arcsec. In the case of the Crab nebula and several other bright sources, the very large number of photons renders the level of statistical uncertainty in the centroid smaller or comparable to this value. Results. We find that the centroid of the Crab nebula in hard X-rays (20-40 keV) is shifted by 8.0 arcsec with respect to the Crab pulsar in the direction of the X-ray centroid of the nebula. A similar shift is also found at higher energies (40-100 and 100-200 keV). We observe a trend of decreasing shift with energy, which can be explained by an increase in the pulsed fraction. To differentiate between the contribution of the pulsar and the nebula, we divide our data into an on-pulse and off-pulse sample. Surprisingly, the nebular emission (i.e., off-pulse) is located significantly away from the X-ray centroid of the nebula. Conclusions. In all 3 energy bands (20-40, 40-100, and 100-200 keV), we find that the centroid of the nebula is significantly offset from the predicted position. We interpret this shift in terms of a cut-off in the electron spectrum in the outer regions of the nebula, which is probably the origin of the observed spectral break around 100 keV. From a simple spherically-symmetric model for the nebula, we estimate that the electrons in the external regions of the torus (d ~ 0.35 pc from the pulsar) reach a maximal energy slightly below 10^14 eV.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.