Paper detail

Insufficient Gas Accretion Caused the Decline in Cosmic Star-Formation Activity 8 Billion Years Ago

Measurements of the atomic hydrogen (HI) properties of high-redshift galaxies are critical to understanding the decline in the star-formation rate (SFR) density of the Universe after its peak $\approx8-11$ Gyr ago. Here, we use $\approx510$ hours of observations with the upgraded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope to measure the dependence of the average HI mass of star-forming galaxies at $z=0.74-1.45$ on their average stellar mass and redshift, by stacking their HI 21 cm emission signals. We divide our sample of 11,419 main-sequence galaxies at $z=0.74-1.45$ into two stellar-mass ($M_*$) subsamples, with $M_*>10^{10} M_\odot$ and $M_*<10^{10} M_\odot$, and obtain clear detections, at $>4.6σ$ significance, of the stacked HI 21 cm emission in both subsamples. We find that galaxies with $M_*>10^{10} M_\odot$, which dominate the decline in the cosmic SFR density at $z\lesssim1$, have HI reservoirs that can sustain their SFRs for only a short period, $0.86\pm0.20$ Gyr, unless their HI is replenished via accretion. We also stack the HI 21 cm emission from galaxies in two redshift subsamples, at $z=0.74-1.25$ and $z=1.25-1.45$, again obtaining clear detections of the stacked HI 21 cm emission signals, at $>5.2σ$ significance in both subsamples. We find that the average HI mass of galaxies with $\langle M_* \rangle\approx10^{10} M_\odot$ declines steeply over a period of $\approx1$ billion years, from $(33.6\pm6.4) \times 10^9 M_\odot$ at $\langle z\rangle\approx1.3$ to $(10.6\pm1.9)\times10^9 M_\odot$ at $\langle z\rangle\approx1.0$, i.e. by a factor $\gtrsim3$. We thus find direct evidence that accretion of HI onto star-forming galaxies at $z\approx1$ is insufficient to replenish their HI reservoirs and sustain their SFRs, thus resulting in the decline in the cosmic SFR density 8 billion years ago.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.