Paper detail

Instability of Universal Terms in the Entanglement Entropy

The role of symmetries in what concerns entanglement entropy has been extensively explored in the last years and revealed a profound connection with the quantum field theory's algebraic structure. Recently, it was found that some universal contributions to the entanglement entropy and mutual information may be non uniquely defined in theories with generalized symmetries. Here, we study this issue in detail in the particular case of the entanglement entropy of the Maxwell theory in $(2+1)$ dimensions for rotationally symmetric regions. In this setup, the problem can be dimensionally reduced to a half-line. We find that the only difference between the reduced problem for the Maxwell field and the reduced scalar free field stems from the Fourier angular $n=0$ mode. This simplification allows us to check explicitly the many issues that characterize models with broken global symmetries. Namely, we manifestly show that the additive algebras break Haag duality, and single out the non-local operators which are responsible for the failure of this property. More interestingly, we present concrete lattice realizations that confirm that the logarithmic "universal" term of the Maxwell entanglement entropy for disks depends on the details of the algebra assignation. This ambiguity hinders the identification of possible topological contributions characteristic of models with generalized symmetries and tarnishes its universal character. We further calculate the Maxwell mutual information for two nearly complementary concentric disks. We obtain the expected universal contribution with a log-log dependence and check that, unlike entropy, this is stable. Accordingly, this supports mutual information as the appropriate probe to sense additivity-duality breaking and the consequent universal topological contributions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.