Paper detail

Inspection of 19 globular cluster candidates in the Galactic bulge with the VVV survey

The census of the globular clusters (GCs) in the Milky Way (MW) is still a work in progress. We explore the nature of 19 new GC candidates in the Galactic bulge, based on the analysis of their colour-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) in the near-IR, using the VISTA Variables in the Via Láctea Survey (VVV) database. We estimate their main astrophysical parameters: reddening and extinction, distance, total luminosity, mean cluster proper motions (PMs), metallicity and age. We obtain the cluster catalogues including the likely cluster members by applying a decontamination procedure on the observed CMDs, based upon the vector PM diagrams from VIRAC2. We estimate a wide reddening range of the $0.25 \leqslant E(J-K_s) \leqslant 2.0$ mag and extinction $0.11 \leqslant A_{Ks} \leqslant 0.86$ mag for the sample clusters as expected in the bulge regions. The range of heliocentric distances is $6.8\leqslant D\leqslant 11.4$ kpc. This allows us to place these clusters between 0.56 and 3.25 kpc from the Galactic centre, assuming $R_{\odot}=8.2$ kpc. Also, their PMs are kinematically similar to the typical motion of the Galactic bulge, apart from VVV-CL160, which shows different PMs. We also derive their metallicities and ages, finding $-1.40 \leqslant$ [Fe/H] $\leqslant 0.0$ dex and $t\approx 8-13$ Gyr respectively. The luminosities are calculated both in $K_{s}-$ and V-bands, recovering $-3.4 \leqslant M_V \leqslant -7.5$. We also examine the possible RR Lyrae members found in the cluster fields. Based on their positions, kinematics, metallicities and ages and comparing our results with the literature, we conclude that 9 candidates are real GCs, 7 need more observations to be fully confirmed as GCs, whereas 3 candidates are discarded for being younger open clusters.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.