Paper detail

Insights on heterogeneity in blinking mechanisms and non-ergodicity using sub-ensemble statistical analysis of single quantum-dots

Photo-luminescence intermittency (blinking) in semiconductor nanocrystals (NCs), a phenomenon ubiquitous to single-emitters, is generally considered to be temporally random intensity fluctuations between bright (On) and dark (Off) states. However, individual quantum-dots (QDs) rarely exhibit such telegraphic signal, and yet, the vast majority of single-NC blinking data are analyzed using a single fixed threshold, which generates binary trajectories. Further, blinking dynamics can vary dramatically over NCs in the ensemble, and it is unclear whether the exponents (m) of single-particle On-/Off-time distributions (P(t)-On/Off), which are used to validate mechanistic models of blinking, are narrowly distributed or not. Here, we sub-classify an ensemble based on the emissivity of QDs, and subsequently compare the (sub)ensemble behaviors. To achieve this, we analyzed a large number (>1000) of intensity trajectories for a model system, Mn+2 doped ZnCdS QDs, which exhibits diverse blinking dynamics. An intensity histogram dependent thresholding method allowed us to construct distributions of relevant blinking parameters (such as m). Interestingly, we find that single QD P(t)-On/Off s follow either truncated power law or power law, and their relative proportion vary over sub-populations. Our results reveal a remarkable variation in m(On/Off) amongst as well as within sub-ensembles, which implies multiple blinking mechanisms being operational among various QDs. We further show that the m(On/Off) obtained via cumulative single-particle P(t)-On/Off is clearly distinct from the weighted mean value of all single-particle m(On/Off), an evidence for the lack of ergodicity. Thus, investigation and analyses of a large number of QDs, albeit for a limited time-span of few decades, is crucial to characterize possible blinking mechanisms and heterogeneity therein

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.