Insight into f0(980)f_0(980) through the B(s)B_{(s)} charmed decays

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

Through analyzing the B(s)B_{(s)} charmed decays B0→Dˉ0f0(980)B^{0}\to \bar D_{0}f_0(980) and Bs→Dˉ0f0(980)B_{s}\to \bar D_{0}f_0(980) within the framework of the PQCD factorization approach and comparing with the current data, we find that there are two possible regions for the f0(980)−f0(500)f_0(980)-f_0(500) mixing angle θθ: one is centered at 34∘∼38∘34^\circ\sim38^\circ and the other is falls into 142∘∼154∘142^\circ\sim154^\circ. The former can overlap mostly with one of allowed angle regions extracted from the decay B0→Dˉ0f0(500)B^{0}\to \bar D_{0}f_0(500). The branching fractions of BsB_s decay modes are less sensitive to the mixing angle compared with those of B decay modes. Especially, for the decay Bs→D0f0(980)B_{s}\to D^0 f_0(980), its branching fraction changes only slightly between (1.2∼1.8)×10−7(1.2\sim1.8)\times10^{-7} when the mixing angle θθ runs from 0∘0^\circ to 180∘180^\circ. All of our results support the picture that the f0(980)f_0(980) is dominated by two quark component in the B decay dynamic mechanism. Furthermore, the ssˉs\bar s component is more important than the qqˉ=(uuˉ+ddˉ)/2q\bar q=(u\bar u+d\bar d)/\sqrt{2} component. This point is different from f0(500)/σf_0(500)/σ. Last but not least, our picture is not in conflict with the popular four-quark explanation.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.