Paper detail

Inside-out star formation quenching and the need for a revision of bulge-disk decomposition concepts for spiral galaxies

Our knowledge about the photometric properties of bulges in late-type galaxies (LTGs) is founded upon image decomposition into a Sérsic model for the central luminosity excess of the bulge and an exponential model for the underlying disk. We argue that the standard practice of adopting an exponential model for the disk all the way to its center is inadequate because it implicitly neglects the fact of star formation (SF) quenching (SFQ) in the centers of LTGs. Extrapolating the fit for the observable star-forming zone of the disk (outside the bulge) inwardly overestimates the true surface brightness of the disk in its SF-quenched central zone. We refer to this effect as Dio. The primary consequence of the neglect of Dio in bulge-disk decomposition studies is the oversubtraction of the disk underneath the bulge, leading to a systematic underestimation of the luminosity of the latter. Framed in the picture of galaxy downsizing and inside-out SFQ, Dio is expected to differentially impact galaxies across redshift and stellar mass M*, thus leading to systematic and complex biases in the scatter and slope of various galaxy scaling relations. We conjecture that correction for Dio will lead to a downbending of the bulge vs. super-massive black hole (SMBH) relation for galaxies below log(M*/Msolar)~10.7. A decreasing M(SMBH)/M* ratio with decreasing M* would help consistently explain the scarcity and weakness of accretion-powered nuclear activity in low-mass spiral galaxies. A well detectable Dio (~2 r mag) can emerge early on through inward migration of SF clumps from the disk in combination with a strong contrast of emission-line equivalent widths between the quenched proto-bulge and its SF periphery. Spatially resolved studies with the JWST, ELT, and Euclid could therefore offer key insights into the chronology and physical drivers of SFQ in the early phase of galaxy assembly. (abridged)

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.