Paper detail

Input-Sparsity Low Rank Approximation in Schatten Norm

We give the first input-sparsity time algorithms for the rank-$k$ low rank approximation problem in every Schatten norm. Specifically, for a given $n\times n$ matrix $A$, our algorithm computes $Y,Z\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times k}$, which, with high probability, satisfy $\|A-YZ^T\|_p \leq (1+ε)\|A-A_k\|_p$, where $\|M\|_p = \left (\sum_{i=1}^n σ_i(M)^p \right )^{1/p}$ is the Schatten $p$-norm of a matrix $M$ with singular values $σ_1(M), \ldots, σ_n(M)$, and where $A_k$ is the best rank-$k$ approximation to $A$. Our algorithm runs in time $\tilde{O}(\operatorname{nnz}(A) + mn^{α_p}\operatorname{poly}(k/ε))$, where $α_p = 0$ for $p\in [1,2)$ and $α_p = (ω-1)(1-2/p)$ for $p>2$ and $ω\approx 2.374$ is the exponent of matrix multiplication. For the important case of $p = 1$, which corresponds to the more &#34;robust&#34; nuclear norm, we obtain $\tilde{O}(\operatorname{nnz}(A) + m \cdot \operatorname{poly}(k/ε))$ time, which was previously only known for the Frobenius norm ($p = 2$). Moreover, since $α_p < ω- 1$ for every $p$, our algorithm has a better dependence on $n$ than that in the singular value decomposition for every $p$. Crucial to our analysis is the use of dimensionality reduction for Ky-Fan $p$-norms.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.