Paper detail

Input Length Matters: Improving RNN-T and MWER Training for Long-form Telephony Speech Recognition

End-to-end models have achieved state-of-the-art results on several automatic speech recognition tasks. However, they perform poorly when evaluated on long-form data, e.g., minutes long conversational telephony audio. One reason the model fails on long-form speech is that it has only seen short utterances during training. In this paper we study the effect of training utterance length on the word error rate (WER) for RNN-transducer (RNN-T) model. We compare two widely used training objectives, log loss (or RNN-T loss) and minimum word error rate (MWER) loss. We conduct experiments on telephony datasets in four languages. Our experiments show that for both losses, the WER on long-form speech reduces substantially as the training utterance length increases. The average relative WER gain is 15.7% for log loss and 8.8% for MWER loss. When training on short utterances, MWER loss leads to a lower WER than the log loss. Such difference between the two losses diminishes when the input length increases.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.