Paper detail

Inner dusty envelope of the AGB stars W~Hydrae, SW\,Virginis, and R~Crateris using SPHERE/ZIMPOL

Stars with initial masses between $\sim0.8$ and 8~$M_\odot$ present copious mass loss during the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) at the end of their lives. The accepted mass-loss mechanism requires radiation pressure acting on dust grains that form in the extended AGB stellar atmospheres. The details of this process are not yet well understood, however. Using the extreme-adaptive-optics imager and polarimeter SPHERE/ZIMPOL, we observed light polarised by grains around W\,Hya, SW\,Vir, and R\,Crt, which have mass-loss rates between 10$^{-7}$ and 10$^{-6}~M_\odot~{\rm yr^{-1}}$. We find the distribution of dust to be asymmetric around the three targets. A biconical morphology is seen for R Crt, with a position angle that is very similar to those inferred from interferometric observations of maser emission and of mid-infrared continuum emission. The cause of the biconical outflow cannot be directly inferred from the ZIMPOL data. The dust grains polarise light more efficiently at 0.65~$μ$m for R\,Crt and SW\,Vir and at 0.82~$μ$m for W\,Hya. This indicates that at the time of the observations, the grains around SW\,Vir and R\,Crt had sizes $< 0.1~μ$m, while those around W\,Hya were larger, with sizes $\gtrsim 0.1~μ$m. The asymmetric distribution of dust around R\,Crt makes the interpretation more uncertain for this star, however. We find that polarised light is produced already from within the visible photosphere of W~Hya, which we reproduce using models with an inner dust shell that is optically thick to scattering. The radial profile of the polarised light observed around W\,Hya reveal a steep dust density profile. We find the wind-acceleration region of W\,Hya to extend to at least $\sim 7~R_\star$, in agreement with theoretical predictions of acceleration up to $\sim 12~R_\star$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.