Paper detail

Injection of $κ$-like Suprathermal Particles into Diffusive Shock Acceleration

We consider a phenomenological model for the thermal leakage injection in the diffusive shock acceleration (DSA) process, in which suprathermal protons and electrons near the shock transition zone are assumed to have the so-called $κ$-distributions produced by interactions of background thermal particles with pre-existing and/or self-excited plasma/MHD waves or turbulence. The $κ$-distribution has a power-law tail, instead of an exponential cutoff, well above the thermal peak momentum. So there are a larger number of potential seed particles with momentum, above that required for participation in the DSA process. As a result, the injection fraction for the $κ$-distribution depends on the shock Mach number much less severely compared to that for the Maxwellian distribution. Thus, the existence of $κ$-like suprathermal tails at shocks would ease the problem of extremely low injection fractions, especially for electrons and especially at weak shocks such as those found in the intracluster medium. We suggest that the injection fraction for protons ranges $10^{-4}-10^{-3}$ for a $κ$-distribution with $10 < κ_p < 30$ at quasi-parallel shocks, while the injection fraction for electrons becomes $10^{-6}-10^{-5}$ for a $κ$-distribution with $κ_e < 2$ at quasi-perpendicular shocks. For such $κ$ values the ratio of cosmic ray electrons to protons naturally becomes $K_{e/p}\sim 10^{-3}-10^{-2}$, which is required to explain the observed ratio for Galactic cosmic rays.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.