Paper detail

Initiation of Coronal Mass Ejections in a Global Evolution Model

Loss of equilibrium of magnetic flux ropes is a leading candidate for the origin of solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs). The aim of this paper is to explore to what extent this mechanism can account for the initiation of CMEs in the global context. A simplified MHD model for the global coronal magnetic field evolution in response to flux emergence and shearing by large-scale surface motions is described and motivated. Using automated algorithms for detecting flux ropes and ejections in the global magnetic model, the effects of key simulation parameters on the formation of flux ropes and the number of ejections are considered, over a 177-day period in 1999. These key parameters include the magnitude and sign of magnetic helicity emerging in active regions, and coronal diffusion. The number of flux ropes found in the simulation at any one time fluctuates between about 28 and 48, sustained by the emergence of new bipolar regions, but with no systematic dependence on the helicity of these regions. However, the emerging helicity does affect the rate of flux rope ejections, which doubles from 0.67 per day if the bipoles emerge untwisted to 1.28 per day in the run with greatest emerging twist. The number of ejections in the simulation is also increased by 20%-30% by choosing the majority sign of emerging bipole helicity in each hemisphere, or by halving the turbulent diffusivity in the corona. For reasonable parameter choices, the model produces approximately 50% of the observed CME rate. This indicates that the formation and loss of equilibrium of flux ropes may be a key element in explaining a significant fraction of observed CMEs.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.