Paper detail

Initial Beam Association in Millimeter Wave Cellular Systems: Analysis and Design Insights

Enabling the high data rates of millimeter wave (mmWave) cellular systems requires deploying large antenna arrays at both the basestations and mobile users. The beamforming weights of these large arrays need to be tuned to guarantee sufficient beamforming gains. Prior work on coverage and rate of mmWave cellular networks focused mainly on the case when basestations and mobile users beamfomring vectors are perfectly designed for maximum beamforming gains. Designing beamforming/combining vectors, though, requires training which may impact both the SINR coverage and rate of mmWave cellular systems. This paper characterizes and evaluates the performance of mmWave cellular networks while accounting for the beam training/association overhead. First, a model for the initial beam association is developed based on beam sweeping and downlink control pilot reuse. To incorporate the impact of beam training into system performance, a new metric, called the effective reliable rate, is defined and adopted. Using stochastic geometry, the effective reliable rate of mmWave cellular networks is derived for two special cases: with near-orthogonal control pilots and with full pilot reuse. Analytical and simulation results provide insights into the answers of three important questions: (i) What is the impact of beam association on mmWave network performance? (ii) Should orthogonal or reused control pilots be employed in the initial beam association phase? (iii) Should exhaustive or hierarchical search be adopted for the beam training phase? The results show that unless the employed beams are very wide or the system coherence block length is very small, exhaustive search with full pilot reuse is nearly as good as perfect beam alignment.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.