Paper detail

Initial Analysis of a Simple Numerical Model that Exhibits Antifragile Behavior

I present a simple numerical model based on iteratively updating subgroups of a population, individually modeled by nonnegative real numbers, by a constant decay factor; however, at each iteration, one group is selected to instead be updated by a constant growth factor. I discover a relationship between these variables and their respective probabilities for a given subgroup, summarized as the variable $c$. When $c>1$, the subgroup is found to tend towards behaviors reminiscent of antifragility; when at least one subgroup of the population has $c\ge1$, the population as a whole tends towards significantly higher probabilities of "living forever," although it may first suffer a drop in population size as less robust, fragile subgroups "die off." In concluding, I discuss the limitations and ethics of such a model, notably the implications of when an upper limit is placed on the growth constant, requiring a population to facilitate an increase in the decay factor to lessen the impact of periods of failure.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.