Paper detail

Inhomogeneity in the early Galactic chemical enrichment exposed by beryllium abundances in extremely metal-poor stars

Abundances of beryllium in metal-poor stars scale linearly with metallicity down to [Fe/H] ~ -3.0. In the stars where Be has been detected at this extremely metal-poor regime, an increased abundance scatter has been previously reported. This scatter could indicate a flattening of the relation between Be and [Fe/H]. Our aim is to perform a new investigation of Be abundances in extremely metal-poor stars and try to clarify whether a Be abundance plateau exists. We revisited the Be abundances in a sample of nine dwarfs with [Fe/H] ~ -3.0. Additionally, we analysed the Be lines in the spectra of stars BPS BS 16968-0061 and CD-33 1173 for the first time. We took advantage of Gaia DR2 parallaxes to refine values of the surface gravity of the stars. Abundances of Be were determined using spectrum synthesis. Some of the stars indeed suggest a flattening. Between [Fe/H] ~ -2.70 and -3.26, the Be abundances stay mostly constant at log(Be/H) ~ -13.2 dex. Nevertheless, for several stars we could only place upper limits that are below that level. Most of the sample stars are consistent with having been formed at the progenitor of the so-called Gaia-Enceladus merger. Two out of the three stars likely formed in-situ are the ones that deviate the most from the linear relation. The mixed origin of these stars offers a clue to understanding the flattening. We suggest that our observations can be understood as a consequence of the inhomogeneous star forming conditions in the early Galaxy. Without efficient mixing, the early ISM would be characterised by a large scatter in Fe abundances at a given moment. Beryllium, on the other hand, because of its origins in cosmic-ray spallation, would have more homogeneous abundances (in a Galaxy-wide sense). We therefore suggest that the observed flattening of the Be-versus-Fe relation reflects a stronger scatter in the Galactic Fe abundances at a given age [abridged].

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.