Paper detail

$λ_\infty$ & Maximum Variance Embedding: Measuring and Optimizing Connectivity of A Graph Metric

Bobkov, Houdré, and the last author [2000] introduced a Poincaré-type functional parameter, $λ_\infty$, of a graph and related it to connectivity of the graph via Cheeger-type inequalities. A work by the second author, Raghavendra, and Vempala [2013] related the complexity of $λ_\infty$ to the so-called small-set expansion (SSE) problem and further set forth the desiderata for NP-hardness of this optimization problem. We confirm the conjecture that computing $λ_\infty$ is NP-hard for weighted trees. Beyond measuring connectivity in many applications we want to optimize it. This, via convex duality, leads to a problem in machine learning known as the Maximum Variance Embedding (MVE). The output is a function from vertices to a low dim Euclidean space, subject to bounds on Euclidean distances between neighbors. The objective is to maximize output variance. Special cases of MVE into $n$ and $1$ dims lead to absolute algebraic connectivity [1990] and spread constant [1998], that measure connectivity of the graph and its Cartesian $n$-power, respectively. MVE has other applications in measuring diffusion speed and robustness of networks, clustering, and dimension reduction. We show that computing MVE in tree-width dims is NP-hard, while only one additional dim beyond width of a given tree-decomposition makes the problem in P. We show that MVE of a tree in 2 dims defines a non-convex yet benign optimization landscape, i.e., local=global optima. We further develop a linear time combinatorial algorithm for this case. Finally, we denote approximate Maximum Variance Embedding is tractable in significantly lower dims. For trees and general graphs, for which Maximum Variance Embedding cannot be solved in less than $2$ and $Ω(n)$ dims, we provide $1+\varepsilon$ approximation algorithms for embedding into $1$ and $O(\log n /\varepsilon^2)$ dims, respectively.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.