Paper detail

Infrared Spectra of Pyroxenes (Crystalline Chain Silicates) at Room Temperature

Pyroxene crystals are common in meteorites but few compositions have been recognized in astronomical environments. We present quantitative room-temperature spectra of 17 Mg-- Fe-- and Ca--bearing ortho- and clinopyroxenes, and a Ca-pyroxenoid in order to discern trends indicative of crystal structure and a wide range of composition. Data are produced using a Diamond Anvil Cell: our band strengths are up to 6 times higher than those measured in KBr or polyethylene dispersions, which include variations in path length (from grain size) and surface reflections that are not addressed in data processing. Pyroxenes have varied spectra: only two bands, at 10.22~$μ$m and 15.34~$μ$m in enstatite (En$_{99}$), are common to all. Peak-wavelengths generally increase as Mg is replaced by Ca or Fe. However, two bands in MgFe-pyroxenes shift to shorter wavelengths as the Fe component increases from 0 to 60 per cent. A high-intensity band shifts from 11.6~$μ$m to 11.2~$μ$m and remains at 11.2~$μ$m as Fe increases to 100~per~cent; it resembles an astronomical feature normally identified with olivine or forsterite. The distinctive pyroxene bands between 13~ and 16~$μ$m show promise for their identification in MIRI spectra obtained with JWST. The many pyroxene bands between 40 and 80~$μ$m could be diagnositic of silicate mineralogy if data were obtained with the proposed SPICA telescope. Our data indicate that comparison between room-temperature laboratory bands for enstatite and cold $\sim 10-K$ astronomical dust features at wavelengths $\gtrsim 28~μ$m can result in the identification of (Mg,Fe)- pyroxenes that contain 7--15 % less Fe-- than their true values because some temperature shifts mimic some compositional shifts. Therefore some astronomical silicates may contain more Fe, and less Mg, than previously thought.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.