Paper detail

Infrared Properties of a Complete Sample of Star-Forming Dwarf Galaxies

We present a study of a large, statistically complete sample of star-forming dwarf galaxies using mid-infrared observations from the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}. The relationships between metallicity, star formation rate (SFR) and mid-infrared color in these systems show that the galaxies span a wide range of properties. However, the galaxies do show a deficit of 8.0 \um\ polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emission as is apparent from the median 8.0 \um\ luminosity which is only 0.004 \lstarf\ while the median $B$-band luminosity is 0.05 \lstarb. Despite many of the galaxies being 8.0 \um\ deficient, there is about a factor of 4 more extremely red galaxies in the [3.6] $-$ [8.0] color than for a sample of normal galaxies with similar optical colors. We show correlations between the [3.6] $-$ [8.0] color and luminosity, metallicity, and to a lesser extent SFRs that were not evident in the original, smaller sample studied previously. The luminosity--metallicity relation has a flatter slope for dwarf galaxies as has been indicated by previous work. We also show a relationship between the 8.0 \um\ luminosity and the metallicity of the galaxy which is not expected given the competing effects (stellar mass, stellar population age, and the hardness of the radiation field) that influence the 8.0 \um\ emission. This larger sample plus a well-defined selection function also allows us to compute the 8.0 \um\ luminosity function and compare it with the one for the local galaxy population. Our results show that below 10$^{9}$ $L$\solar, nearly all the 8.0 \um\ luminosity density of the local universe arises from dwarf galaxies that exhibit strong \ha\ emission -- i.e., 8.0 \um\ and \ha\ selection identify similar galaxy populations despite the deficit of 8.0 \um\ emission observed in these dwarfs.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.