Abstract

We study a 24\,μμm selected sample of 330 galaxies observed with the Infrared Spectrograph for the 5\,mJy Unbiased Spitzer Extragalactic Survey. We estimate accurate total infrared luminosities by combining mid-IR spectroscopy and mid-to-far infrared photometry, and by utilizing new empirical spectral templates from {\em Spitzer} data. The infrared luminosities of this sample range mostly from 109^9L⊙_\odot to 1013.510^{13.5}L⊙_\odot, with 83% in the range 1010^{10}L⊙_\odot<<LIR_{\rm IR}<1012<10^{12}L⊙_\odot. The redshifts range from 0.008 to 4.27, with a median of 0.144. The equivalent widths of the 6.2\,μμm aromatic feature have a bimodal distribution. We use the 6.2\,μμm PAH EW to classify our objects as SB-dominated (44%), SB-AGN composite (22%), and AGN-dominated (34%). The high EW objects (SB-dominated) tend to have steeper mid-IR to far-IR spectral slopes and lower LIR_{\rm IR} and redshifts. The low EW objects (AGN-dominated) tend to have less steep spectral slopes and higher LIR_{\rm IR} and redshifts. This dichotomy leads to a gross correlation between EW and slope, which does not hold within either group. AGN dominated sources tend to have lower log(LPAH7.7μm_{\rm PAH 7.7μm}/LPAH11.3μm_{\rm PAH 11.3μm}) ratios than star-forming galaxies, possibly due to preferential destruction of the smaller aromatics by the AGN. The log(LPAH7.7μm_{\rm PAH 7.7μm}/LPAH11.3μm_{\rm PAH 11.3μm}) ratios for star-forming galaxies are lower in our sample than the ratios measured from the nuclear spectra of nearby normal galaxies, most probably indicating a difference in the ionization state or grain size distribution between the nuclear regions and the entire galaxy. Finally, we provide a calibration relating the monochromatic 5.8, 8, 14 and 24um continuum or Aromatic Feature luminosity to LIR_{\rm IR} for different types of objects.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.