Paper detail

Infrared Finite Scattering Theory in Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Gravity

Infrared (IR) divergences arise in scattering theory with massless fields and are manifestations of the memory effect. There is nothing singular about states with memory, but they do not lie in the standard Fock space. IR divergences are artifacts of trying to represent states with memory in the standard Fock space. For collider physics, one can impose an IR cutoff and calculate inclusive quantities. But, this approach cannot treat memory as a quantum observable and is highly unsatisfactory if one views the S-matrix as fundamental in QFT and quantum gravity, since the S-matrix is undefined. For a well-defined S-matrix, it is necessary to define in/out Hilbert spaces with memory. Such a construction was given by Faddeev and Kulish (FK) for QED. Their construction "dresses" momentum states of the charged particles by pairing them with memory states of the electromagnetic field to produce states of vanishing large gauge charges at spatial infinity. However, in massless QED, due to collinear divergences, the "dressing" has an infinite energy flux so these states are unphysical. In Yang-Mills theory the "soft particles" used for dressing also contribute to the current flux, invalidating the FK procedure. In quantum gravity, the analogous FK construction would attempt to produce a Hilbert space of eigenstates of supertranslation charges at spatial infinity. However, we prove that there are no eigenstates of supertranslation charges except the vacuum. Thus, the FK construction fails in quantum gravity. We investigate some alternatives to FK constructions but find that these also do not work. We believe that to treat scattering at a fundamental level in quantum gravity - as well as in massless QED and YM theory - it is necessary to take an algebraic viewpoint rather than shoehorn the in/out states into some fixed Hilbert space. We outline the framework of such an IR finite scattering theory.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.