Paper detail

Infrared colour properties of nearby radio-luminous galaxies

By combining the data of the Two Micron All Sky Survey, the \textit{Wide Field Infrared Survey Explorer} and the \textit{AKARI} satellite, we study the infrared colour properties of a sample of 2712 nearby radio-luminous galaxies (RLGs). These RLGs are divided into radio-loud (RL) active galactic nuclei (AGNs), mainly occurring at redshifts of $0.05<z<0.3$ and star-forming-dominated RLGs (SFGs), mainly occurring at redshifts of $0.01<z<0.15$. RL AGNs and SFGs are separately distributed in the ([3.4]$-$[4.6])$-$([4.6]$-$[12]) two-colour diagram, in which the RL AGNs display a double-core distribution, and the SFGs display a single-core distribution. SFGs have a redder [4.6]$-$[12] colour than RL AGNs due to the significant contribution from the dust component of SFGs. We find simple criteria of MIR colour separation between RL AGNs and SFGs such that: 95$\%$ of RL AGNs have [4.6]$-$[12] $<$ 3.0 and 94$\%$ of SFGs have [4.6]$-$[12] $>$ 3.0. We also analyse the MIR colours of RL AGNs divided into low- and high-excitation radio galaxies (LERGs and HERGs, respectively). The ([3.4]$-$[4.6])$-$([4.6]$-$[12]) diagram clearly shows separate distributions of LERGs and HERGs and a region of overlap, which suggests that LERGs and HERGs have different MIR properties. LERGs are responsible for the double-core distribution of RL AGNs on the ([3.4]$-$[4.6])$-$([4.6]$-$[12]) diagram. In addition, we also suggest 90$-$140$μ$m band spectral index $α(90,140)<-1.4$ as a criterion of selecting nearby active galaxies with non-thermal emissions at far-infrared wavelengths.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.