Paper detail

Information theory and player archetype choice in Hearthstone

Using three years of game data of the online collectible card game Hearthstone, we analyse the evolution of the game's system over the period 2016--2019. By considering the frequencies that archetypes are played, and their corresponding win-rates, we are able to provide narratives of the system-wide changes that have occurred over time, and player reactions to them. Applying the archetype frequencies to analyse the system's Shannon entropy, we characterise the salient features of the time series of player choice. Paying particular attention to how entropy is affected during periods of both small and large-scale change, we are able to demonstrate the effects of increased player experimentation before popular decks and tactics emerge. Furthermore, constructing conditional probabilities that simulate understandable player behaviour, we analyse the system's information storage and test the explain-ability of current player choice based on previous decision-making.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.