Paper detail

Information Percolation and Cutoff for the Random-Cluster Model

We consider the Random-Cluster model on $(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})^d$ with parameters $p \in (0,1)$ and $q\ge 1$. This is a generalization of the standard bond percolation (with open probability $p$) which is biased by a factor $q$ raised to the number of connected components. We study the well known FK-dynamics on this model where the update at an edge depends on the global geometry of the system unlike the Glauber Heat Bath dynamics for spin systems, and prove that for all small enough $p$ (depending on the dimension) and any $q>1$, the FK-dynamics exhibits the cutoff phenomenon at $λ_{\infty}^{-1}\log n$ with a window size $O(\log\log n)$, where $λ_{\infty}$ is the large $n$ limit of the spectral gap of the process. Our proof extends the Information Percolation framework of Lubetzky and Sly [21] to the Random-Cluster model and also relies on the arguments of Blanca and Sinclair [4] who proved a sharp $O(\log n)$ mixing time bound for the planar version. A key aspect of our proof is the analysis of the effect of a sequence of dependent (across time) Bernoulli percolations extracted from the graphical construction of the dynamics, on how information propagates.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.