Paper detail

Information Measures, Inequalities and Performance Bounds for Parameter Estimation in Impulsive Noise Environments

Recent studies found that many channels are affected by additive noise that is impulsive in nature and is best explained by heavy-tailed symmetric alpha-stable distributions. Dealing with impulsive noise environments comes with an added complexity with respect to the standard Gaussian environment: the alpha-stable probability density functions have an infinite second moment and the "nice" Hilbert space structure of the space of random variables having a finite second moment is lost along with its tools and methodologies. This is indeed the case in estimation theory where classical tools to quantify performance of an estimator are tightly related to the assumption of finite variance variables. In alpha-stable environments, expressions such as the mean square error and the Cramer-Rao bound are hence problematic. In this work, we tackle the parameter estimation problem in impulsive noise environments and develop novel tools that are tailored to the alpha-stable and heavy-tailed noise environments, tools that coincide with the standard ones adopted in the Gaussian setup, namely a generalized "power" measure and a generalized Fisher information. We generalize known information inequalities commonly used in the Gaussian context: the de Bruijn's identity, the data processing inequality, the Fisher information inequality, the isoperimetric inequality for entropies and the Cramer-Rao bound. Additionally, we derive upper bounds on the differential entropy of independent sums having a stable component. Finally, the new "power" measure is used to shed some light on the additive alpha-stable noise channel capacity in a setup that generalizes the linear average power constrained AWGN channel. Our theoretical findings are paralleled with numerical evaluations of various quantities and bounds using developed {\em Matlab} packages.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.