Paper detail

Information entropy in cosmological inference problems

The subject of this paper is a quantification of the information content of cosmological probes of the large-scale structures, specifically of temperature and polarisation anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background, CMB-lensing, weak cosmic shear and galaxy clustering, in terms of Information theory measures like information entropies. We aim to establish relationships for Gaussian likelihoods, between conventional measures of statistical uncertainties and information entropies. Furthermore, we extend these studies to the computation of (Bayesian) evidences and the power of measurement to distinguish between competing models. We investigate in detail how cosmological data decreases information entropy by reducing statistical errors and by breaking degeneracies. In addition, we work out how tensions between data sets increase information entropy and quantify this effect in three examples: the discrepancy in $Ω_m$ and $σ_8$ between the CMB and weak lensing, the role of intrinsic alignments in weak lensing data when attempting the dark energy equation of state parameters, and the famous $H_0$-tension between Cepheids in the Hubble keystone project and the cosmic microwave background as observed by Planck.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.