Paper detail

Informant Discrepancies and the Heritability of Antisocial Behavior: A Meta-Analysis

Antisocial behavior, which includes both aggressive and delinquent activities, is the opposite of prosocial behavior. Researchers have studied the heritability of antisocial behavior among twin and non-twin sibling pairs from behavioral ratings made by parents, teachers, observers, and youth. Through a meta-analysis, we examined longitudinal and cross sectional research in the behavioral genetics of antisocial behavior, consisting of 42 studies, of which 38 were studies of twin pairs, 3 were studies of twins and non-twin siblings, and 1 was a study of adoptees. These studies provided n = 89 heritability (h2) effect size estimates from a total of 94,517 sibling pairs who ranged in age from 1.5 to 18 years; studies provided data for 29 moderators (predictors). We employed a random-effects meta-analysis model to achieve three goals: (a) perform statistical inference of the overall heritability distribution in the underlying population of studies, (b) identify significant study level moderators (predictors) of heritability, and (c) examine how the heritability distribution varied as a function of age and type of informant, particularly in longitudinal research. The meta-analysis indicated a bimodal overall heritability distribution, indicating two clusters of moderate and high heritability values, respectively; identified four moderators that predicted significant changes in mean heritability; and indicated differential patterns of median h2 and variance (interquartile ranges) across informants and ages. We argue for a cross-perspective, cross-setting model for selecting informants in behavioral genetic research, that is flexible and sensitive to changes in antisocial behavior over time.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.