Paper detail

Influences of three-dimensional gas flow induced by protoplanets on pebble accretion --$\rm\,I\,$. shear regime

The pebble accretion model has the potential to explain the formation of various types of planets. A growing planet embedded in a disk induces three-dimensional (3D) gas flow, which may influence pebble accretion. In this study, we investigate the influence of the 3D planet-induced gas flow on pebble accretion. Assuming a non-isothermal, inviscid gas disk, we perform 3D hydrodynamical simulations on the spherical polar grid. Then we numerically integrate the equation of motion of pebbles in 3D using hydrodynamical simulations data. We find that the trajectories of pebbles in the planet-induced gas flow differ significantly from those in the unperturbed shear flow for a wide range of pebble sizes investigated (${\rm St}=10^{-3}$--$10^{0}$, where ${\rm St}$ is the Stokes number). The horseshoe flow and outflow of the gas alter the motion of the pebbles, which leads to the reduction of the width of the accretion window, $w_{\rm acc}$, and the accretion cross section, $A_{\rm acc}$. On the other hand, the changes in trajectories also cause an increase in relative velocity of pebbles to the planet, which offsets the reduction of $w_{\rm acc}$ and $A_{\rm acc}$. As a consequence, in the Stokes regime, the accretion probability of pebbles, $P_{\rm acc}$, in the planet-induced gas flow is comparable to that in the unperturbed shear flow except when the Stokes number is small, ${\rm St}\sim10^{-3}$, in 2D accretion, or when the thermal mass of the planet is small, $m=0.03$ in 3D accretion. In contrast, in the Epstein regime, $P_{\rm acc}$ in the planet-induced gas flow becomes smaller than that in the shear flow in the Stokes regime in both 2D and 3D accretion, regardless of assumed ${\rm St}$ and $m$. Our results suggest that the 3D planet-induced gas flow may be helpful to explain the distribution of exoplanets as well as the architecture of the solar system.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.