Paper detail

Influence of Topology and Porosity on Size Effects in Stripes of Cellular Material with Honeycomb Structure under Shear, Tension and Bending

Cellular solids are known to exhibit size effects, i.e., differences in the apparent effective elastic moduli, when the specimen size becomes comparable to the cell size. The present contribution employs direct numerical simulations (DNS) of the mesostructure to investigate the influences of porosity, shape of pores, and thus material distribution along the struts, and orientation of loading on the size effects and effective moduli of regular honeycomb structures. Beam models are compared to continuum models for simple shear, uniaxial loading and pure bending of strips of finite width. It is found that the honeycomb structure exhibits a considerable anisotropy of the size effects and that honeycomb structures with circular pores exhibit considerably stronger size effects than those with hexagonal pores (and thus straight struts). Positive (stiffening) size effects are observed under simple shear and negative (softening) size effects under bending and uniaxial loading. The negative size effects are interpreted in terms of the stress-gradient theory.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.