Paper detail

Influence of Thermal Fluctuations on Uniform and Nonuniform Superconducting Rings according to the Ginzburg--Landau and the Kramer--Watts-Tobin Models

We evaluate the influence of thermal fluctuations on superconducting rings that enclose a magnetic flux, using the time-dependent Ginzburg--Landau (TDGL) or the Kramer--Watts-Tobin (KWT) model, while thermal fluctuations are accounted for by means of Langevin terms. This method is applicable in situations where previous methods are not, such as nonuniform loops, rings with large width to radius ratio and loops with large coherence length to perimeter ratio. We evaluate persistent currents, position and statistical behavior of flux-induced vortices and lifetime of metastable fluxoid states. The influence of nonuniformity on the persistent current does not depend strongly on the details of the cross-section profile; it depends mainly on its first harmonic, but not only on it. As a consequence of nonuniformity the maximum of the persistent current shifts to smaller fluxes and the passage between fluxoid states remains non-hysteretic down to lower temperatures than in the case of a uniform sample. Our results using TDGL agree remarkably well with recent measurements of the persistent current in superconducting rings and with measurements of the position of a vortex that mediates between fluxoid states in an asymmetric disk with a hole; they could also provide a plausible explanation for unexpectedly short measured lifetimes of metastable states. Comparison between TDGL and KWT indicates that they lead to the same results for the persistent current, whereas KWT leads to larger lifetimes than TDGL.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.