Paper detail

Influence of the source arrangement on shell growth around GaN nanowires in molecular beam epitaxy

In a combined experimental and theoretical study, we investigate the influence of the material source arrangement in a molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) system on the growth of nanowire (NW) core-shell structures. In particular, we study the shell growth of GaN around GaN template NWs under the boundary condition that Ga and N do not impinge on a given sidewall facet at the same time. Our experiments with different V/III ratios and substrate temperatures show that obtaining shells with homogeneous thickness along the whole NW length is not straightforward. Analyzing in detail the shell morphology with and without substrate rotation, we find that the different azimuthal angles of the sources have a major impact on the Ga adatom kinetics and the final shell morphology. On the basis of these experimental results, we develop a diffusion model which takes into account different NW facets and the substrate. The model allows to describe well the experimental shell profiles and predicts that homogeneous shell growth can be achieved if the Ga and N source are arranged next to each other or for very high rotation speeds. Moreover, the modeling reveals that the growth on a given side facet can be categorized within one rotation in four different phases: the Ga wetting phase, the metal-rich growth phase, the N-rich growth phase, and the dissociation phase. The striking difference to growth processes on planar samples is that, in our case, diffusion takes place between different regions, i.e. the sidewall vs. the top facet and substrate, out of which on one N impinges not continuously, resulting in complex gradients in chemical potential that are modulated in time by substrate rotation. The comprehensiveness of our model provides a deep understanding of diffusion processes and the resulting adatom concentration, and could be applied to other 3D structures and material systems

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.