Paper detail

Influence of the electron density on the thickness-dependent energy gap oscillations in superconducting metallic nanofilms

The thickness-dependent energy gap oscillations in the metallic nanofilms are investigated by the use of the self-consistent numerical solutions of the Bogoliubov-de Gennes equations. It is shown, that the oscillations are induced by the quasi-particle energy quantization triggered by the confinement of electrons in the direction perpendicular to the sample. We have analyzed, how the changes in the electron density of states ($n_e$) and the electron-phonon coupling constant ($g$) influence the amplitude of the considered oscillations. It has been found, that the increase in $n_e$ and the decrease in $g$, can lead to a significant reduction of the oscillations amplitude. As a result, for the values of the mentioned parameters corresponding to some of the realistic situations the thickness-dependent superconducting gap oscillations can be almost completely suppressed.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.