Paper detail

Influence of the Cut-off Elevation Angle and Elevation-Dependent Weighting on Parameter Estimates: A Case of CONT05

In this paper, results are presented on studies which have been performed to investigate the impact of the cut-off elevation angle (CEA) and elevation-dependent weighting (EDW) on the EOP estimates and baseline length repeatability. For this test, CONT05 observations were processed with different CEA and EDW, keeping all other options the same as used during the routine processing. Uncertainties and biases, as well as correlations between estimated parameters have been investigated. It has been shown that small CEA, up to about 8--10 degrees does not have large impact on the results, and applying EDW allows us to get better result (smaller errors). However, this result has been proven with standard geodetic VLBI observations, where rather few observations were made at low elevations. Perhaps, special R&D sessions with more uniform distribution of observations over elevation may be useful for more detailed study on the subject.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.