Paper detail

Influence of surfactant crystallization on the aggregation rate of dodecane-in-water nanoemulsions. Changes in the viscosity of the external phase

Rates of aggregation of dodecane-in-water (d/w) nanoemulsions stabilized with 7.5 mM sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) are evaluated beyond 500 mM NaCl. As in the case of hexadecane-in-water (h/w) emulsions, it is found that flocculation rates apparently decrease with the ionic strength, departing appreciably from theoretical predictions. Since many-particle simulations proved to be very time consuming, an accurate knowledge of experimental parameters is necessary prior to the realization of further evaluations. Here, the change in the viscosity of the aqueous solution due to the surfactant phase behavior is considered as a possible cause of referred phenomenon. The influence of the external viscosity on the outcome of the simulations is appraised using a quotient between the actual viscosity of the surfactant solution at a given salt concentration and its value in the absence of salt. For that purpose, the viscosity of 0.5 and 7.5 mM SDS solutions was measured between 300 an 900 mM NaCl for temperatures of 20 and 25 °C. It is concluded that the augment of the aqueous viscosity due to the formation of surfactant crystals diminish significantly the aggregation rate. Yet this decline seems insufficient to justify the observed reduction of kFC at 25 C. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that a 5-degree change in the temperature of the surfactant solution causes a remarkable decrease of kFC . Additionally, a set of two-particle simulations is used here to illustrate the limitations of this methodology for the appraisal of the viscosity contribution. It is confirmed that such approach is only convenient to study the effect of the interaction potential on the aggregation rate, as it was formerly conceived by Fuchs [1936].

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.