Paper detail

Influence of equilibrium and nonequilibrium environments on macroscopic realism through the Leggett-Garg inequalities

We study the macroscopic realism (macrorealism) through the two- and three-time Leggett-Garg inequalities (LGIs) in a two interacting qubits system. The two qubits are coupled either with two bosonic (thermal or photonic) baths or fermionic (electronic) baths. We study both how the equilibrium and nonequilibrium environments influence the LGIs. One way to characterize the nonequilibrium condition is by the temperature difference (for the bosonic bath) or the chemical potential difference (for the fermionic bath). We also study the heat or particle current and the entropy production rate generated by the nonequilibrium environments. Analytical forms of LGIs and the maximal value of LGIs based on the quantum master equation beyond the secular approximation are derived. The LGI functions and the corresponding maximal value have separated contributions, the part describing the coherent evolution and the part describing the coupling between the system and environments. The environment-coupling part can be from the equilibrium environment or the nonequilibrium environment. The nonequilibrium dynamics is quantified by the Bloch-Redfield equation which is beyond the Lindblad form. We found that the nonequilibriumness quantified by the temperature difference or the chemical potential difference can lead to the LGIs violations or the increase of the maximal value of LGIs, restoring the quantum nature from certain equilibrium cases where LGIs are preserved. The corresponding nonequilibrium thermodynamic cost is quantified by the nonzero entropy production rate. Our finding of the nonequilibrium promoted LGIs violations suggests a new strategy for the design of quantum information processing and quantum computational devices to maintain the quantum nature and quantum correlations for long.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.