Paper detail

Influence of Collimation and Detector length on CT exposures measured in a 60cm long body phantom

Background: Data fitting approaches to modeling allow for parametric formulae that may not reveal the physical quantities involved and their influence on the function being studied. In this paper the author models the approach to equilibrium function by a method that allows the physical quantities to be defined beforehand, allows their influence to be studied, and can be used to predict how each physical quantity affects approach to equilibrium. Methods: An ordinary differential equation (ODE) is used to model the approach to equilibrium function for the case where collimation is changed at fixed detector size. A parallel model is used to study the approach to equilibrium as a function of detector size for fixed collimation. Both models are validated by experimental measurements in a 60cm body phantom. Influence of detector size is simulated by using leaded sleeves of varying sizes wrapped around a 100mm pencil chamber. This creates sleeve gaps of 10 - 60mm around the chamber. A 100mm detector size is the pencil chamber without a leaded sleeve. Results: Model accurately describes the experimental data for the cases studied. Except for the smallest collimation of 5mm, linear regression analysis shows good correlation between data and model according to the R^2 values at all collimations. Further analysis of the model reveals minimum detector size that will integrate 98% of the signal for a given collimation is, d=4.95L. Additional analysis shows the minimum collimation at which a given detector will collect 98% of the signal is, L=5.49d. Conclusion: Modeling by differential equations is an accurate method for the approach to equilibrium function, and has advantages over curve fitting methods.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.