Paper detail

Influence of C/O Ratio on Hot Jupiter Atmospheric Chemistry

We have conducted laboratory experiments to study the chemistry in hot Jupiter atmospheres with C/O ratio of 0.35. We have compared our results with the ones obtained previously for atmospheres with a C/O ratio of 1 to investigate the influence of the C/O ratio on the chemistry and formation of photochemical organic aerosol. We found that the C/O ratio and the gas mixture compositions strongly influence the pathways responsible for the formation of CO2. Thermochemical reactions are primarily responsible for the formation of CO2 in low C/O ratio atmospheres, while photochemistry is the dominant process in high C/O ratio atmospheres even if the final CO2 concentration is the same in both cases. Our results show that low C/O atmospheres at the thermochemical equilibrium contain a higher water abundance, while high C/O atmospheres are significantly depleted in water. However, in low C/O atmospheres, the water abundance is not affected by UV photolysis, while our previous work demonstrated that significant amount of water can be produced in high C/O ratio atmospheres. This contrast in water production suggests that photochemistry should be considered when interpreting exoplanet transit spectra. Finally, we did not observe the formation of a detectable amount of non-volatile photochemical aerosols in low C/O atmospheres, in contrast to our previous study. We infer that for C/O ratio < 1, water likely inhibits organic growth and aerosol formation, suggesting that photochemical organic aerosols are likely to be observed in planets presenting a carbon enrichment compared to their host stars.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.