Paper detail

Inflows in massive star formation regions

How high-mass stars form remains unclear currently. Calculation suggests that the radiation pressure of a forming star can halt spherical infall, preventing its further growth when it reaches 10 M$_{\odot}$. Two major theoretical models on the further growth of stellar mass were proposed. One model suggests the mergence of less massive stellar objects, and the other is still through accretion but with the help of disk. Inflow motions are the key evidence of how forming stars further gain mass to build up massive stars. Recent development in technology has boosted the search of inflow motion. A number of high-mass collapse candidates were obtained with single dish observations, mostly showed blue profile. The infalling signatures seem to be more common in regions with developed radiation pressure than in younger cores, which opposes the theoretical prediction and is also very different from that of low mass star formation. Interferometer studies so far confirm such tendency with more obvious blue profile or inverse P Cygni profile. Results seem to favor the accretion model. However, the evolution tendency of the infall motion in massive star forming cores needs to be further explored. Direct evidence for monolithic or competitive collapse processes is still lack. ALMA will enable us to probe more detail of gravity process.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.