Paper detail

Inflation model selection revisited after a 1.91% measurement of the Hubble constant

The recent local measurement of the Hubble constant based on the distance-ladder method has reached a $1.91\%$ precision, but this result is in tension with the early-universe measurements at the more than 4$σ$ level, bringing a crisis to the contemporary cosmology. In addition to the end-to-end test of the $Λ$CDM model in the late universe, it is also of great interest to see how the local $H_0$ measurement affects the determination of the primordial power spectra, and further to test the influences for the inflation model selection. Here, we constrain the primordial power spectra of scalar and tensor perturbations by using a series of observational data, including the Planck 2015 cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature and polarization power spectra data, the Planck 2018 lensing power spectrum data, the BICEP2/Keck Array CMB B-mode data, and also the prior of optical depth $τ=0.054\pm0.007$, as well as the late-universe measurements (baryon acoustic oscillations and type Ia supernovae). In particular, we use the latest $1.91\%$ measurement of the Hubble constant, $H_{0}=74.03\pm1.42$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, in this cosmological test. We find that considering the latest local $H_{0}$ measurement in the data combination will lead to a larger fit value of $n_{\rm s}$. With the addition of the latest local measurement of $H_{0}$, it is found that the natural inflation model is totally excluded at the $2σ$ level, the Starobinsky $R^{2}$ inflation model is marginally favored at around the $2σ$ level, and the spontaneously broken SUSY inflation model is the most favored model.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.