Abstract

In this paper we introduce and study a new property of infinite words: An infinite word x∈ANx\in A^\mathbb{N}, with values in a finite set AA, is said to be kk-self-shuffling (k≥2)(k\geq 2) if xx admits factorizations: x=∏i=0∞Ui(1)⋯Ui(k)=∏i=0∞Ui(1)=⋯=∏i=0∞Ui(k)x=\prod_{i=0}^\infty U_i^{(1)}\cdots U_i^{(k)}=\prod_{i=0}^\infty U_i^{(1)}=\cdots =\prod_{i=0}^\infty U_i^{(k)}. In other words, there exists a shuffle of kk-copies of xx which produces xx. We are particularly interested in the case k=2k=2, in which case we say xx is self-shuffling. This property of infinite words is shown to be an intrinsic property of the word and not of its language (set of factors). For instance, every aperiodic word contains a non self-shuffling word in its shift orbit closure. While the property of being self-shuffling is a relatively strong condition, many important words arising in the area of symbolic dynamics are verified to be self-shuffling. They include for instance the Thue-Morse word and all Sturmian words of intercept 0<ρ<10<ρ<1 (while those of intercept ρ=0ρ=0 are not self-shuffling). Our characterization of self-shuffling Sturmian words can be interpreted arithmetically in terms of a dynamical embedding and defines an arithmetic process we call the {\it stepping stone model}. One important feature of self-shuffling words stems from its morphic invariance, which provides a useful tool for showing that one word is not the morphic image of another. The notion of self-shuffling has other unexpected applications particularly in the area of substitutive dynamical systems. For example, as a consequence of our characterization of self-shuffling Sturmian words, we recover a number theoretic result, originally due to Yasutomi, on a classification of pure morphic Sturmian words in the orbit of the characteristic.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.