Paper detail

Inferring the velocity of early massive stars from the abundances of extremely metal-poor stars

The nature of the first massive stars may be inferred by investigating the origin of the extremely metal-poor (EMP) stars, likely formed from the ejecta of one or a few previous massive stars. We investigate the rotational properties of early massive stars by comparing the abundance patterns of EMP stars with rotating massive stellar models. Low metallicity 20 $M_{\odot}$ stellar models with initial rotation rates between 0 and $70~\%$ of the critical velocity are computed. Explosions with strong fallback are assumed. The ejected material is considered to fit individually the abundance patterns of 272 EMP stars with $-4<$ [Fe/H] $<-3$. With increasing initial rotation, the [C/H], [N/H], [O/H], [Na/H], [Mg/H] and [Al/H] ratios in the massive star ejecta are gradually increased. Among the 272 EMP stars considered, $\sim 40-50~\%$ are consistent with our models. About $60 - 70~\%$ of the CEMP star sample is reproduced against $\sim 20 - 30~\%$ for the C-normal EMP star sample. The CEMP stars are preferentially reproduced with a material coming from mid to fast rotating massive stars. The velocity distribution derived from the best massive star models increases from no rotation to fast rotation. The maximum is reached for massive stars having initial equatorial velocities of $\sim 550 - 640$ km~s$^{-1}$. Although subject to significant uncertainties, these results suggest that the rotational mixing operating in between the H-burning shell and the He-burning core of early massive stars played an important role in the early chemical enrichment of the Universe. The comparison of the velocity distribution derived from the best massive star models with velocity distributions of nearby OB stars suggests a greater amount of massive fast rotators in the early Universe. This may have important consequences for reionization or integrated light from high redshift galaxies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.