Paper detail

Inferring the IGM thermal history during reionisation with the Lyman-$α$ forest power spectrum at redshift $z \simeq 5$

We use cosmological hydrodynamical simulations to assess the feasibility of constraining the thermal history of the intergalactic medium during reionisation with the Ly$α$ forest at $z\simeq5$. The integrated thermal history has a measureable impact on the transmitted flux power spectrum that can be isolated from Doppler broadening at this redshift. We parameterise this using the cumulative energy per proton, $u_0$, deposited into a gas parcel at the mean background density, a quantity that is tightly linked with the gas density power spectrum in the simulations. We construct mock observations of the line of sight Ly$α$ forest power spectrum and use a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach to recover $u_{0}$ at redshifts $5 \leq z \leq 12$. A statistical uncertainty of $\sim 20$ per cent is expected (at 68 per cent confidence) at $z\simeq 5$ using high resolution spectra with a total redshift path length of $Δz=4$ and a typical signal-to-noise ratio of $\rm S/N=15$ per pixel. Estimates for the expected systematic uncertainties are comparable, such that existing data should enable a measurement of $u_0$ to within $\sim 30$ per cent. This translates to distinguishing between reionisation scenarios with similar instantaneous temperatures at $z\simeq 5$, but with an energy deposited per proton that differs by $2$-$3\, \rm eV$ over the redshift interval $5\leq z \leq 12$. For an initial temperature of $T\sim 10^{4}\rm\,K$ following reionisation, this corresponds to the difference between early ($z_{\rm re}=12$) and late ($z_{\rm re}=7$) reionisation in our models.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.