Paper detail

Inferring temporal dynamics from cross-sectional data using Langevin dynamics

Cross-sectional studies are widely prevalent since they are more feasible to conduct compared to longitudinal studies. However, cross-sectional data lack the temporal information required to study the evolution of the underlying processes. Nevertheless, this is essential to develop predictive computational models which is the first step towards causal modelling. We propose a method for inferring computational models from cross-sectional data using Langevin dynamics. This method can be applied to any system that can be described as effectively following a free energy landscape, such as protein folding, stem cell differentiation and reprogramming, and social systems involving human interaction and social norms. A crucial assumption in our method is that the data-points are gathered from a system in (local) equilibrium. The result is a set of stochastic differential equations which capture the temporal dynamics, by assuming that groups of data-points are subject to the same free energy landscape and amount of noise. Our method is a 'baseline' method which initiates the development of computational models which can be iteratively enhanced through the inclusion of expert knowledge. We validate the proposed method against two population-based longitudinal datasets and observe significant predictive power in comparison with random choice algorithms. We also show how the predictive power of our 'baseline' model can be enhanced by incorporating domain expert knowledge. Our method addresses an important obstacle for model development in fields dominated by cross-sectional datasets.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.