Paper detail

Inferring Galactic Parameters from Chemical Abundances: A Multi-Star Approach

Constraining parameters such as the initial mass function high-mass slope and the frequency of type Ia supernovae is of critical importance in the ongoing quest to understand galactic physics and create realistic hydrodynamical simulations. In this paper, we demonstrate a method to precisely determine these using individual chemical abundances from a large set of stars, coupled with some estimate of their ages. Inference is performed via the simple chemical evolution model Chempy in a Bayesian framework, marginalizing over each star's specific interstellar medium parameters, including an element-specific `model error' parameter to account for inadequacies in our model. Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) methods are used to sample the posterior function, made possible by replacing Chempy with a trained neural network at negligible error. The approach is tested using data from both Chempy and the IllustrisTNG simulation, showing sub-percent agreement between inferred and true parameters using data from up to 1600 individual stellar abundances. For IllustrisTNG, strongest constraints are obtained from metal ratios, competitive with those from other methods including star counts. Analysis using a different set of nucleosynthetic yields shows that incorrectly assumed yield models can give non-negligible bias in the derived parameters; this is reduced by our model errors, which further show how well the yield tables match data. We also find a significant bias from analyzing only a small set of stars, as is often done in current analyses. The method can be easily applied to observational data, giving tight bounds on key galactic parameters from chemical abundances alone.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.