Paper detail

Inferred timescales for common envelope ejection using wide astrometric companions

Evolution of close binaries often proceeds through the common envelope stage. The physics of the envelope ejection (CEE) is not yet understood, and several mechanisms were suggested to be involved. These could give rise to different timescales for the CEE mass-loss. In order to probe the CEE-timescales we study wide companions to post-CE binaries. Faster mass-loss timescales give rise to higher disruption rates of wide binaries and result in larger average separations. We make use of data from Gaia DR2 to search for ultra-wide companions (projected separations $10^3$-$2\times 10^5$ a.u. and $M_2 > 0.4$ M$_\odot$) to several types of post-CEE systems, including sdBs, white-dwarf post-common binaries, and cataclysmic variables. We find a (wide-orbit) multiplicity fraction of $1.4\pm 0.2$ per cent for sdBs to be compared with a multiplicity fraction of $5.0\pm 0.2$ per cent for late-B/A/F stars which are possible sdB progenitors. The distribution of projected separations of ultra-wide pairs to main sequence stars and sdBs differs significantly and is compatible with prompt mass loss (upper limit on common envelope ejection timescale of $10^2$ years). The smaller statistics of ultra-wide companions to cataclysmic variables and post-CEE binaries provide weaker constraints. Nevertheless, the survival rate of ultra-wide pairs to the cataclysmic variables suggest much longer, $\sim10^4$ years timescales for the CEE in these systems, possibly suggesting non-dynamical CEE in this regime.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.