Paper detail

Inference of dispersion measure from incoherent time-steady sources

Several recent papers have proposed schemes by which a dispersion measure, and hence electron column, could be obtained from a time-steady, incoherent radio source at a cosmological distance (such as an active galactic nucleus). If correct, this would open a new window on the distribution of intergalactic baryons. These schemes are based on the statistical properties of the received radiation, such as the 2- or 4-point correlation function of the received electric field, and in one case on the quantum nature of the electromagnetic field. We show, on the basis of general principles, that these schemes are not sensitive to dispersion measure (or have an extremely small signal-to-noise ratio), because (i) the classical 2-point correlation function is unaffected by dispersion; (ii) for a source with a large number of incoherently emitting electrons, the central limit theorem obliterates additional information in higher-order functions; and (iii) such an emitter produces a radiation density matrix that is equivalent to a statistical distribution of coherent states, which contains no information that is not already in the statistics of the classical waveforms. Why the proposed observables do not depend on dispersion measure (or have extremely tiny dependences) is discussed in detail.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.